SoVote

Bill C-23

44th Parl. 1st Sess.

March 21, 2023

This bill, titled the Historic Places of Canada Act, aims to protect and conserve places, persons, and events that have national historic significance or are of national interest. It establishes the powers and duties of the federal minister responsible for this act, including the designation of such places, persons, and events, as well as the protection and conservation of their heritage value. The bill continues the Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada and modifies its composition to include representatives for First Nations, Inuit, and Métis. It also requires the establishment and maintenance of a public register that includes information about designated places, persons, and events. The bill imposes obligations for the protection and conservation of designated places that are under the administration of federal ministers or certain Crown corporations, including consultation with the Parks Canada Agency before any action i

I would like to provide a steelman argument in favor of the Historic Places of Canada Act: The Historic Places of Canada Act is necessary to protect and conserve the heritage value of designated places, persons, and events of national historic significance or national interest. Historic places are significant sources of pride and enjoyment for Canadians, and it is in the public interest to preserve them for present and future generations. This Act recognizes the Government of Canada's leadership role in protecting and conserving historic places in Canada. It also aligns with the Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, demonstrating Canada's commitment to preserving the outstanding universal value of World Heritage sites. One important aspect of this Act is the recognition and inclusion of Indigenous history, heritage values, and contributions. The designation of places, persons, and events of

Steelman argument opposing Bill C-23: While the protection and conservation of historic places, persons, and events of national importance is undoubtedly important, opponents of Bill C-23 may argue that the Act gives the federal government too much power and control over these designations. They may argue that this will limit the autonomy of provinces and territories to make decisions regarding their own historical sites and heritage values. Critics may also express concerns about the potential for political bias in the designation process, as the Act does not provide clear guidelines for how places, persons, and events are to be assessed and designated. They may argue that this lack of transparency could lead to arbitrary designations or the exclusion of certain sites from being recognized. Additionally, opponents may voice concerns about the financial burden that this Act may place on federal authorities and Crown corporations, as the