Hon. Marc Gold (Government Representative in the Senate): Thank you for your question.

The Government of Canada recognizes that many sectors of our economy, and many individuals within those sectors, are facing challenging times. We came out of the pandemic in pretty good shape compared to most other countries, but that doesn’t mean it didn’t take its toll. Businesses are still living with that, whether it is the shortage of materials, supply chain problems that still plague us or human resources issues.

That said, the Government of Canada — in its Fall Economic Statement and in all of its measures — is doing its best to find the right balance of prudent fiscal management in a time of economic contraction while still providing the support necessary. The Government of Canada continues to believe that its price on pollution is an appropriate policy measure.

It believes the rebates offered to Canadians, whether generally or in sectors, do in fact mitigate to some degree the effect of those.

Hon. Marc Gold (Government Representative in the Senate): For once, I will be very brief with my answer.

No, I have no alternatives to propose. The government is of the view that this amendment is unnecessary and inappropriate. Ultimately, we will soon put it to the vote and see. At least I hope that’s the case. Ultimately, it is up to us to decide. I’ve done my best to explain the government’s point of view. Ultimately, we will proceed with the vote. If the amendment passes, the House of Commons will consider it with the respect it typically gives our amendments, and we will see whether a message comes back or not. That’s all I can say. No, I have no alternative to propose.

[English]