SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 311

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
May 8, 2024 02:00PM
Context: House Hansard - 311 - May/8/24
Ms. Leah Taylor Roy
  • May/8/24 6:34:52 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I am questioning the relevance of the member's speech to the motion that was put forward to delete the short title of the act. I am having a hard time trying to connect it to—
46 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 311 - May/8/24
The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes)
  • May/8/24 6:38:41 p.m.
  • Watch
I will indicate to the hon. member that I heard the comments; there were two of them, so I would ask the hon. member to please withdraw those comments so that he can continue on with his speech.
38 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 311 - May/8/24
The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes)
  • May/8/24 6:39:24 p.m.
  • Watch
I did catch it the first time. However, I thought the hon. member was changing course, but there was a second time as well. Therefore, I am asking the hon. member to withdraw his comments so that he can go on with his speech.
44 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 311 - May/8/24
The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes)
  • May/8/24 6:39:45 p.m.
  • Watch
The hon. member for Battle River—Crowfoot can continue with his speech.
13 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 311 - May/8/24
Mr. Damien Kurek
  • May/8/24 7:07:59 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order. During my speech that preceded the speech of the hon. member, or at least that it is what we are considered in this place, it was made very clear that impugning an individual's motives required an apology and a withdrawal. Out of respect for the Chair and the institution here, I gave exactly that, yet the member has now gone on at length with these tinfoil-hat-type conspiracies, impugning the good reputation of members of this place. I would simply ask that there be a fair application of the rules of this place to all political parties.
108 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 311 - May/8/24
The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes)
  • May/8/24 7:08:42 p.m.
  • Watch
I am sorry. I heard it but I did not see to whom it was directed or how it was directed, so I am going to look into that and come back to the House if need be. I do want to remind members to try to keep their speech directly to the motion that is before the House, which is on the short title. I would remind the hon. parliamentary secretary of that as well. The hon. parliamentary secretary is rising on the same point of order.
88 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 311 - May/8/24
Mr. Kevin Lamoureux
  • May/8/24 7:09:22 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I think that it is highly inappropriate for members to continue to stand up on a point of order on just a 10-minute speech. I do not know how many points of order there have been. It is very disruptive and does not contribute to debate. What the member is referring to is when I made reference to the fact that one has the leadership within the Conservative Party actually meeting with organizations like Diagolon. I think that most Canadians would see that as a bad thing. That is where the leadership is getting the advice to do the type of things that it is doing today. An hon member: Oh, oh! Mr. Kevin Lamoureux: The member should not be interrupting—
125 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 311 - May/8/24
The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes)
  • May/8/24 7:17:43 p.m.
  • Watch
I will ask the member to start his speech again. They want to continue the debate. Would the hon. parliamentary secretary please take it outside? The hon. member for Joliette.
30 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 311 - May/8/24
Mrs. Brenda Shanahan (Châteauguay—Lacolle, Lib.)
  • May/8/24 7:31:39 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-59 
Madam Speaker, I also really appreciated my colleague's speech. It is interesting to me that the members of the Standing Committee on Finance were able to work together. I completely understand that, and an amendment proposed by my Bloc Québécois colleague was even adopted. Nevertheless, he said in his speech that he will be voting against Bill C-59. I am trying to understand why. I would also like an answer regarding this evening's motion. Is he for or against the short title?
89 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border