SoVote

Context: House Hansard - 213 - Jun/14/23

Mr. Alexandre Boulerice (Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie, NDP)

Jun/14/23 8:38:04 p.m.
Watch
Re: Bill C-35

Madam Speaker, I thank my colleague for his speech, although, at the end, I was somewhat hurt by the fact that he did not talk about the possibility of an NDP government in five or six years. I will try to rise above that this evening. I completely agree with him that Quebec led the way with its accessible public child care program. That program changed the lives of tens of thousands of Quebec families. It is good that the rest of Canada is finally following Quebec's lead today. We, in the NDP, insisted that accessible public child care be subsidized by the government or provided by non-profit organizations. I would like to ask my colleague a question about the matter of choice that the Conservatives have been talking a lot about. When a parent is forced to stay at home because private child care services cost $50, $60 or $80 a day and it would cost them more to go to work, that is not a choice. What the Conservatives want is a lack of choice where a parent has to stay at home because private child care services are too costly. That is what the Conservatives want.

201 words

Context: House Hansard - 213 - Jun/14/23

Mr. Alexandre Boulerice (Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie, NDP)

Jun/14/23 8:56:27 p.m.
Watch
Re: Bill C-35

Madam Speaker, I would like to thank the leader of the NDP for his inspiring speech. It is true that, in Quebec, early childhood centres and public child care has been accessible for 25 years. This program should help fathers as much as mothers, but because of the inequity in family-related and domestic tasks, this kind of program is more advantageous to mothers. Economist Pierre Fortin even estimated that, in the first years of the program in Quebec, 70,000 women were able to return to the labour market thanks to these accessible, public and universal child care centres. According to the NDP leader, what are the benefits for families in Ontario, British Columbia and just about everywhere else in Canada?

123 words

Context: House Hansard - 213 - Jun/14/23

Mr. Alexandre Boulerice (Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie, NDP)

Jun/14/23 10:25:50 p.m.
Watch
Re: Bill C-35

Madam Speaker, I thank my colleague for his speech. Obviously, we in the NDP support Bill C‑35. It is a good idea. We have been saying for a long time that child care is needed. The strange thing is that the Liberal Party has also been saying that for a long time. The first time they put it in their election platform was in 1993. I was still a student at the Université de Montréal. It took them 30 years, but it is better late than never. However, I do want to stress one point. While the Conservatives say that it is incredibly expensive, it is an incredible rebate for families who will be able to access day care at an average cost of $10 a day. This will save them money. When a family is paying $50 or $60 a day in child care costs, no tax cut will be able to put as much money into the family income as access to $10-a-day child care. I would like to hear my colleague comment on the fact that this is a program that puts money back into the pockets of families.

199 words

Context: House Hansard - 213 - Jun/14/23

Mr. Alexandre Boulerice (Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie, NDP)

Jun/14/23 10:40:16 p.m.
Watch
Re: Bill C-35

Madam Speaker, obviously, we are delighted with the bill, even though, as I said earlier, it took the Liberal Party 30 years to get there. Our confidence in the Liberals was so low that we were careful to include this in the 27-point agreement we negotiated with the minority government. We pushed hard for this, and my colleague from Winnipeg Centre fought to ensure that accessible, public, non-profit child care was given priority. We also stressed that child care educators had to receive good wages and good working conditions. I would like my colleague to speak to the importance of having high-calibre, trained professionals care for our children.

111 words