44th Parl. 1st Sess.
February 2, 2023 10:00AM
- Feb/2/23 10:04:28 a.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present, in both official languages, the 24th report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts in relation to the motion adopted on Monday, January 30, 2023, regarding McKinsey & Company.
37 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:04:48 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, today is Groundhog Day, and I am proud to represent Canada’s world-famous prognosticator, Wiarton Willie.
Before I share his prediction, I will share how Groundhog Day began for most Canadians. Their alarms went off, they rolled over, grabbed their phones and read about a Liberal sweetheart deal for McKinsey. The next day, their alarms went off, they rolled over, grabbed their phones and were shocked to see yet another McKinsey contract for millions of dollars. They went to bed that night thinking this nightmare had to end, but lo and behold, when they woke up the next morning there was another million-dollar contract for McKinsey.
We may think Bill Murray had it bad in the movie Groundhog Day, but after eight years and random Liberal after another random Liberal getting rich, it is costing taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars.
The good news is that Wiarton Willie brought hope for Canadians this morning. In the great riding of Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound, he predicted an early spring, and he also predicted an end to the Liberal scandals and a Conservative win in the next federal election.
194 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:29:08 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Liberals funnelled over $100 million into McKinsey's coffers, and that is just the tip of the iceberg. Millions have gone to KPMG, Deloitte and their ilk. Not only is this a waste of taxpayer dollars, but it takes away from our public service. It is a form of privatization. In the meantime, the Liberals are being stingy at the bargaining table. Our public service employees deserve respect.
Why do the Liberals have millions of dollars for their consulting firm friends but nothing for public service employees?
91 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:30:17 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, Canadians deserve accountability and transparency from the government. They deserve answers on Conservatives' and Liberals' long-standing partnership with expensive consulting firms when Canada has one of the best public services. McKinsey is just the tip of the iceberg. That is why New Democrats are calling to investigate firms that have been raking in hundreds of millions of dollars from the government, like Deloitte and PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Will the Liberals and Conservatives both agree to stop giving piles of public money to their friends at consulting firms and support a full investigation into government outsourcing?
96 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:38:56 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, Ottawa wants to receive at least 500,000 immigrants a year until we have a population of 100 million. These targets are inspired by the Century Initiative, which originated with McKinsey and its former director, Dominic Barton.
Yesterday, in committee, I asked Mr. Barton if he had analyzed the impact of this increase in immigration on the future of French. He replied, and I will paraphrase, that the focus was just on the economics, not the social context.
Did the government paste and copy a McKinsey immigration policy that completely ignores the future of French in Canada and Quebec?
103 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:41:41 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, Dominic Barton himself admitted that McKinsey did not consider the impact on French before recommending unprecedented increases to immigration. Unless and until we see the studies the Bloc Québécois has been calling for, we have to assume that the federal government did not consider the impact on French either before implementing McKinsey's recommendations. Obviously, that raises other questions.
Can this government prove that it did consider the impact on housing needs, health care and immigration, or did it just blindly put its faith in a subcontractor like McKinsey?
95 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:43:03 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, while Canadians have been suffering for eight years under the government, well-connected insiders have never had it so good. Dominic Barton confirmed yesterday that McKinsey's Canadian lead, Andrew Pickersgill, was coordinating support from McKinsey to the Prime Minister's growth council. In other words, his analysts were telling the government what it needed while they were selling McKinsey as a solution at the same time. If that is not a conflict of interest, I do not know what is.
Will the government end the obvious conflict of interest and finally tell the House how much money was spent on McKinsey?
104 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:44:15 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, we do know the government stands on the side of those Canadians who work for McKinsey. However, on this side of the House we speak for the vast majority of Canadians who are concerned about $100 million in contracts and the public service not knowing what work was done.
After eight years, more Canadians than ever are suffering because of the opioid crisis, but the government continues to defend its friends. McKinsey's managing director, Dominic Barton, claimed to have no knowledge of the relationship with Purdue Pharma.
Did the Prime Minister or government ministers have any conversations with McKinsey staff about the opioid crisis? Yes or no.
110 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- menumenu
- notificationsnotifications
- home
- mailmail
- searchsearch
