SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 130

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
November 18, 2022 10:00AM
  • Nov/18/22 10:23:36 a.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-32 
Madam Speaker, the member recognized some valid points that the government is seriously considering, and some issues we can address. I want to also highlight and get the member's perspective on a couple of progressive measures that we have seen. Within this legislation, we now provide support through getting rid of the interest on student loans. Prior to that, we had the children's dental program, where we are providing dental supports for children under the age of 12. Both issues are very much on the progressive side. They are going to have a wonderful impact in communities throughout the country. Could he provide his thoughts on the importance of progressive policies, such as the two I cited?
119 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/18/22 11:26:02 a.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, one thing that needs to be recognized is that never before in the history of Canada have we seen a government that has invested so much in infrastructure in every region of our country. We want to continue to work with the different stakeholders, provinces and municipalities in order to get shovels in the ground. With regard to the specifics, I will ensure that the minister is very aware of the situation.
74 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/18/22 12:09:56 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, just to add to that point of order, it is well established that when the mace is on the table, pictures in the chamber are not permitted, so if there were pictures being taken from a caucus room, that should be looked into.
45 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/18/22 12:10:36 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8)(a), I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the government's response to 12 petitions. These returns will be tabled in an electronic format.
35 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/18/22 12:15:07 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, the following questions will be answered today: Nos. 846 and 850.
13 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/18/22 12:15:26 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, if the government's responses to Questions Nos. 845 and 847 to 849 could be made orders for return, these returns would be tabled immediately.
27 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/18/22 12:15:41 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I would ask that all remaining questions be allowed to stand.
13 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/18/22 12:26:17 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-32 
Mr. Speaker, there are many things I could make reference to in regard to the fall economic statement. However, I am very curious about what the Green Party's position is, and more specifically what the member's position is in regard to nuclear power. Does she feel there is a role for nuclear power in Canada?
57 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/18/22 12:41:44 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-32 
Mr. Speaker, in listening to the member opposite's comments, I would like to encourage her to recognize that yes, inflation is very significant and is having an impact, but when we do a comparison around the world, Canada is doing exceptionally well in the inflation fight. That does not mean we should not put in efforts, and we have been putting in efforts, focusing on the hardships that Canadians are having to go through on a daily basis. That is why, for example, we have a dental program. We have a rental program. We have a student program. We have the enhanced GST rebates. All of these are there to put more money in the pockets of Canadians in all regions of the country, yet the member seemed to completely overlook that the government has been there. Is she aware of how many of the provincial governments are contributing to putting money in the pockets of Canadians? Is there a provincial example she can cite that we can take a look at?
173 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/18/22 1:11:44 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-32 
Madam Speaker, the member has an issue in terms of credibility. He talks about the price on pollution, and let me use that as an example. The Conservative Party of Canada, in the last federal election, campaigned on a price on pollution. It supported it. It has taken a complete 180° change on that. In other words, it did a flip-flop. Now the Conservatives call it the carbon tax once again, and they are going to get rid of it. Then the member says that the residents of Winnipeg North and Canadians are paying more than they are receiving. The Parliamentary Budget Officer also made it very clear that, dollar for dollar, 80% of the constituents of Winnipeg North are receiving more than they are paying into it. The member is trying to give a false impression. There is an independent budget officer saying that 80% of the residents of Winnipeg North and others are receiving more than they are paying into it. What would he say to that particular report from the Parliamentary Budget Officer?
178 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/18/22 1:27:47 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-32 
Madam Speaker, when the member and the Conservatives talk about taxes, one thing that always amazes me is they will refer to the CPP. They look at the CPP as a tax increase. Because there would be more money invested in the CPP, they are calling it a tax on Canadians. However, the money being contributed to the CPP ensures that when it comes time to retire, workers have more money in their pockets. When the Conservatives attack that issue, they are actually attacking the workers and their ability to retire with more funds. When they talk about the price on pollution, the very thing they supported in the last federal election, they leave out the fact that there are increases in the environment fund, which is putting more money into Canadians' pockets. Can the member explain why, on those two aspects—
143 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Madam Speaker, there has always been a great deal of concern whenever we hear of bankruptcies and employees being taken advantage of, especially when we hear highlights of executive pay that is definitely unreasonable. A while back we passed some legislation that made it a little more transparent, allowing courts to claw back in situations of that nature. I was not at the committee, but I am very curious about whether any exploratory work was done on that issue.
79 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border