SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 94

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
June 22, 2022 02:00PM
  • Jun/22/22 4:33:09 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8)(a), I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the government's response to seven petitions. These returns will be tabled in an electronic format.
35 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/22/22 4:58:28 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, the following questions will be answered today: Nos. 561, 563 and 565.
14 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/22/22 4:59:10 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, if revised response to Question No. 444, originally tabled on May 13, 2022, and the government's response to Questions Nos. 562, 564 and 566 could be made orders for returns, these returns would be tabled immediately.
39 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/22/22 4:59:19 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I would ask that all notices of motions for the production of papers be allowed to stand.
19 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/22/22 4:59:19 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I would ask that all remaining questions be allowed to stand.
13 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/22/22 5:19:26 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I will be very brief on two points, with reference to the question of privilege raised earlier today. If I may, I will first provide a comment from the Speaker of the House who issued a news release back on February 18 notifying members. I will read it directly: As per the Parliamentary Protective Service’s (PPS) most recent email notification, a police operation is expected to take place on Wellington Street and other locations in the downtown core of Ottawa. Given these exceptional circumstances, and following discussion with all recognized party leadership, the sitting today is cancelled. More information will follow. I cite that, because at times there are environments in which, through consultation, there is a need for the House, such as in last night's case, to adjourn. That is just the reality, and I think that I am using this to cite the precedent. The other thing I would like to highlight is that I would like to draw to your attention some pertinent details around the adjournment of the House last night. At 8:54 p.m., you, the Deputy Speaker, resumed the sitting of the House. When you did this, you stated the following: “I would like to inform members that we are still having trouble with the network. There is an estimation this will not be solved this evening, so I am wondering if we can come up with an agreement.” Given that you, the Deputy Speaker, made the request that agreement be sought to adjourn, I rose in response to see if there was an agreement to adjourn, given the challenges being experienced. No one's privileges were breached. I was responding to the information and the request from the Deputy Speaker to adjourn, so that the problem could be fixed and so that all MPs could participate.
318 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/22/22 6:53:11 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-21 
Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I suspect you might be thinking I am rising to say that the member is stating mistruths on the record, but that is not it. The member has made reference to the Prime Minister by using his name, and we are not allowed to use the name of the Prime Minister or any other member.
64 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/22/22 6:57:49 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-21 
Madam Speaker, the Conservatives' back room is working hard. They have the new spin going on in regard to the whole issue of guns. Wherever they can get personal and start attacking, that is what they are going to do. That is what we have heard for the last five or six minutes from the member. It is just comments attacking the integrity of the system. I will stand by the RCMP. I support the RCMP. The minister has been very clear on the RCMP, but the member does not let the facts cause issues. In the legislation, there is the issue of yellow flags and red flags, an area that I think the vast majority of Canadians, and I suspect even some Conservatives, would support. What is the member's opinion on the value of having the red flags and yellow flags in the legislation?
146 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/22/22 7:22:35 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I would like to use myself as an example. I was one of the members who tested positive for COVID and was unable to participate in person, and this was just last week. My choice was between coming into the chamber knowing that I had tested positive for COVID or using the hybrid provisions to attend. Because the hybrid format was there, I was able to be engaged in debates, at least on a few occasions. I was also able to vote. I think it sends a message to my constituents in terms of doing the right thing by not coming here and speaking and voting. In that way I can protect my colleagues and ultimately demonstrate leadership in the community.
123 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border