SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 18

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
December 15, 2021 02:00PM
  • Dec/15/21 3:20:38 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. This member knows better than that. We cannot ask for a unanimous consent motion after you have already entertained one.
29 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/15/21 5:24:53 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Madam Speaker, I heard this member say, as well as a number of members from the Conservative Party, that police officers have a load of tools at their disposal. Police officers have the option to charge or not to charge. They do not have a load of tools at their disposal. The individuals who have the tools at their disposal are the judges. I do not understand this messaging. Even if he was right and they did have a load of tools at their disposal, why do the Conservatives believe that police officers should have discretion but judges should not? What is it about judges that leads the Conservatives to have a massive lack of trust that judges can properly execute the option of using those tools and be discretionary in their judgment?
133 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/15/21 6:08:47 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for whatever that was. The member talked about a “get out of jail free” card. It is actually just a fundamental philosophical difference of how to approach crime. The approach of the Conservatives is very simple, “lock 'em up and throw away the key”. I believe that the member probably actually believes that. I would encourage him to stand and say that yes, his approach is to lock them up and throw away the key. Unfortunately for him, the majority of society believes that the government has a role to play in rehabilitation and reintegration of people into society. He talks about a “get out of jail free” card. Where is that even coming from? The bill is about removing a mandatory minimum and giving that power to the judge to be able to prescribe what the sentencing should be. Could the member please explain to the House why he does not have faith in judges to make those decisions?
172 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border