44th Parl. 1st Sess.
December 13, 2021 11:00AM
- Dec/13/21 11:43:31 a.m.
- Watch
I do want to remind the member that he is to address questions and comments to the Chair and not directly to the government.
24 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Dec/13/21 11:43:37 a.m.
- Watch
- Re: Bill C-5
Madam Speaker, I do appreciate that. I will direct them through you. Of course, I hope that the government is reminded about its heckling, as the opposition is held ruthlessly to account.
We want to ask the government these questions: Does it really have a mandate to expand conditional sentences for these crimes? Does it have a mandate to let someone out, and to not have someone go to jail for a minimum amount of time, for the crimes of importing or exporting an unauthorized firearm, extortion with a firearm, and robbery with a firearm? The government says it has a mandate. Did government members really go to their communities to say that this is right, and that the community wanted them to let people out who have committed robbery with a firearm? Is that the kind of accountability in justice that we want in this country? I do not think so.
Does the parliamentary secretary have a mandate for recklessly discharging a firearm?
164 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Dec/13/21 11:45:07 a.m.
- Watch
- Re: Bill C-5
On a point of order, Madam Speaker, are we in questions and comments right now? I believe my friend opposite asked me a specific question that I would be glad to—
32 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Dec/13/21 11:45:13 a.m.
- Watch
That is not a point of order.
I am hearing heckling on both sides and individuals providing their feedback, even on the hon. member's side. I know that the hon. member is very capable of delivering his speech.
I want to remind members on the government side that should they have questions and comments, they should wait until that time comes. There should be no heckling and participating in the debate until it is time for questions and comments.
The hon. member for Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes.
93 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Dec/13/21 11:45:50 a.m.
- Watch
- Re: Bill C-5
I am concerned, Madam Speaker, that the parliamentary secretary has been named as a representative of the government, but does not understand how simple debate works in the House. He thinks that if a rhetorical question is put through the Speaker to the government in response to Liberals creating disorder in the House, suddenly they have standing to interrupt debate and start answering questions.
However, I have more questions for the parliamentary secretary and perhaps he will rise and courageously proclaim that the Liberals' expansion of conditional sentencing for people convicted of dangerous and violent offences is what Canadians sent them here to do. I would encourage him to do that, to stand up and say just that, not to blame previous Conservative governments for enacting mandatory minimum penalties. It was Jean Chrétien who put most of those on the books.
It is unbelievable that Liberals are so fearful that the truth about this bill is going to be exposed that they do not even want the debate to unfold. It has been happening for 40 minutes and they are already in a panic. I hear members on the Liberal benches again attempting to create disorder. The heckles do not come from the official opposition. We know that, rightfully—
212 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Dec/13/21 11:47:27 a.m.
- Watch
The hon. parliamentary secretary is very well aware of the rules in the House and I hope they can serve as an example to others by ensuring that they wait for questions and comments. The more we have to stop the clock, the more it takes away from other members who wish to debate.
I remind members that there are only two minutes and 30 seconds left for the hon. member to finish his debate and there will be opportunities for everyone to participate during questions and comments.
The hon. member for Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes.
101 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Dec/13/21 11:48:06 a.m.
- Watch
- Re: Bill C-5
Madam Speaker, much to the chagrin of the member for Kingston and the Islands, who is very upset that the Conservatives continue to expose the Liberal government's soft-on-crime approach, we are going to continue to do that, because we have a mandate from Canadians. We know the government wants to crack down on law-abiding gun owners while letting gangbangers out with a warning. It is no problem if someone possessed a firearm for the purpose of weapons trafficking, no problem at all. The Liberals will continue to push their soft-on-crime approach, a criminal-first agenda, and everyday Canadians will suffer the consequences. It is truly shameful. Hug a thug, indeed.
Conservatives will stand up for the victims of crime and for the safety of our communities. In spite of the disorder Liberals look to create in this place, we will not be silenced by their attempts.
152 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Dec/13/21 11:49:29 a.m.
- Watch
- Re: Bill C-5
Madam Speaker, I am a little speechless as to how to respond to my friend opposite, because there is very little truth in what he said.
Let me very clearly—
31 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Dec/13/21 11:49:41 a.m.
- Watch
I am going to interrupt. The hon. member for Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes just asked me to be very vigilant on the heckling on the other side, and he is doing the same thing. I would ask the hon. member to wait to hear the question so he can answer it. I am sure he will want to hear all the details.
The hon. parliamentary secretary.
71 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Dec/13/21 11:50:04 a.m.
- Watch
- Re: Bill C-5
Madam Speaker, at the outset, let me just be clear: Bill C-22 was introduced earlier this year. It was in our platform. On September 20, Canadians gave us a mandate to reintroduce that bill, because we promised to do so within the first 100 days. That is exactly what Bill C-5 represents.
I have a very direct question for my friend opposite. He has not used the words “systemic racism” at all. He has not even acknowledged that systemic racism exists within the criminal justice system. He has not addressed that within his comments this morning.
Why has he not included that important term in his speech today?
112 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Dec/13/21 11:50:50 a.m.
- Watch
- Re: Bill C-5
Madam Speaker, the parliamentary secretary is talking about Bill C-22, which is really interesting. We are dealing with Bill C-5. Why are we dealing with Bill C-5 and not Bill C-22? It is because the Liberal Prime Minister, against the agreement of all parliamentarians in the previous Parliament, called an election during a pandemic. He killed his own legislation. He did not want to enact anything he had put forward at the time, because Liberals like to try to confuse motion for action. They get very little done. In this case, it is dangerous that one of the first pieces of legislation they are looking to enact is a soft-on-crime bill that punishes victims and rewards criminals.
123 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Dec/13/21 11:51:58 a.m.
- Watch
- Re: Bill C-5
Madam Speaker, I would like to give my hon. colleague a chance to talk about something he failed to mention regarding this bill. Perhaps he has an opinion on this.
Does he not believe that, as we face this disturbing opioid crisis, it is important to ensure that addictive behaviours are not criminalized and, with that in mind, the best approach to helping people who are struggling with substance abuse and addiction is to repeal mandatory minimum sentences? That is one aspect of the only approach that works, namely, harm reduction.
91 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Dec/13/21 11:52:52 a.m.
- Watch
- Re: Bill C-5
Madam Speaker, we know that the Public Prosecution Service of Canada has already issued a directive with respect to these types of diversion measures. The effect of codifying them and having Bill C-5 enacted is that there will not be much of a difference between what is currently happening and what would happen as a result of this bill being put in place for those measures.
What we would see is the repeal of these mandatory minimum penalties and conditional discharges, weakening the accountability for folks who are committing drug trafficking and drug manufacturing offences. This, of course, is going to gravely impact our communities and have a negative impact on folks who are suffering from addiction. With respect to diversion measures, the ones that are currently in place and the directive issued are appropriate.
136 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Dec/13/21 11:54:00 a.m.
- Watch
- Re: Bill C-5
Madam Speaker, I feel like I am stuck in some kind of time warp after hearing the comments from the member for Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes. That speech could have been given 10 years ago.
In the meantime, we have had more than a decade of experience with mandatory minimums and we know what they result in. They do not result in less crime. They result in the overincarceration of indigenous people and the overincarceration of Black Canadians. The academic literature is clear; our practical experience is clear, and even jurisdictions like Texas have given up on mandatory minimums as a solution to crime problems.
Will the Conservatives join us in the 21st century and give up this dated rhetoric about mandatory minimums that somehow implies that taking them away removes penalties altogether?
138 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Dec/13/21 11:54:43 a.m.
- Watch
- Re: Bill C-5
Madam Speaker, it is incredibly important that we have accountability measures in place. The mandatory minimums being repealed are going to weaken accountability; it is that simple. The crimes that are going to be impacted and the criminals who will be impacted will have been convicted of committing serious offences.
Victims need someone speaking up for them. That is exactly what we are doing here today. These crimes, the list I have read out twice, are not minor offences. They are serious and dangerous offences committed by dangerous people. The penalties being repealed serve as an accountability mechanism and should remain in place.
103 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Dec/13/21 11:55:47 a.m.
- Watch
- Re: Bill C-5
Madam Speaker, I cannot believe what I just heard from my colleague from the NDP. If he thinks it is a relic of the past to put people in prison for sexual assault, for trafficking in persons and for kidnapping, I will be a relic of the past for a long time. They just—
55 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Dec/13/21 11:56:08 a.m.
- Watch
I am sorry. I have a point of order from the hon. member for Kingston and the Islands.
I want to remind members to hold off on their thoughts while someone is speaking.
33 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Dec/13/21 11:56:20 a.m.
- Watch
- Re: Bill C-5
Madam Speaker, it is not like me to come to the defence of members of other parties, but what the member from the Conservative Party just stated was a complete, utter lie and misrepresentation of what was—
38 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Dec/13/21 11:56:32 a.m.
- Watch
3 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Dec/13/21 11:56:39 a.m.
- Watch
- Re: Bill C-5
Madam Speaker, on a point of order, the member for Kingston and the Islands just accused the member for Regina—Lewvan of lying. I am just wondering, with respect to—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh!
37 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
