SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Ontario Assembly Bill

Ontario Bill 126

43rd Parl. 1st Sess.
June 06, 2023
Ban iGaming Advertising Act, 2023
  • This is a law called the Ban iGaming Advertising Act, 2023. It prohibits the promotion of online gambling sites through advertising. Anyone who promotes these sites through advertising can be fined between $25,000 and $1,000,000. The law does not apply to certain situations, such as the distribution of imported publications or the use of online gambling in artistic works without receiving payment. The law will come into effect 30 days after it receives Royal Assent.
  • H1
  • H2
  • H3
  • RA
  • Yea
  • Nay
  • star_border

SteelmanSpren in Favour

  • One steelman argument in favor of Bill 126 2023, also known as the Ban iGaming Advertising Act, is that it aims to protect vulnerable individuals from the potential harms associated with online gambling. By prohibiting the advertising of online gambling sites, the government is taking a proactive approach to reduce the exposure and accessibility of these platforms to individuals who may be susceptible to developing gambling addictions or experiencing financial difficulties as a result of their gambling habits. The act recognizes the potential negative impact of online gambling and seeks to limit its promotion, particularly to those who may be more susceptible to its allure. By restricting advertising, the act aims to reduce the temptation and exposure to online gambling sites, thereby potentially preventing individuals from engaging in harmful gambling behaviors. Furthermore, the act includes exemptions for certain forms of media and artistic expression, ensuring that legitimate forms of entertainment and expression are not unduly restricted. This demonstrates a balanced approach that acknowledges the importance of artistic freedom and the need to differentiate between promotional content and other forms of media that may incidentally feature online gambling. By imposing fines for contravention of the act, it sends a strong message that the government takes the issue of online gambling seriously and is committed to enforcing regulations that protect individuals from potential harm. This deterrent effect may discourage advertisers from promoting online gambling sites, further reducing the exposure and accessibility of these platforms. Overall, the Ban iGaming Advertising Act can be seen as a responsible and proactive measure to safeguard vulnerable individuals from the potential negative consequences of online gambling, while still allowing for legitimate forms of expression and media.

SteelmanSpren Against

  • Steelman Argument Opposing Bill 126 2023: While Bill 126 aims to prohibit advertising for online gambling sites, there are several right-wing anti-government talking points that can be used to argue against this legislation. 1. Individual Freedom: The government should not have the authority to dictate what individuals can or cannot advertise. By restricting advertising for online gambling sites, the government is infringing upon the individual freedom of businesses and individuals to promote their products and services as they see fit. This is a violation of personal liberty and undermines the principles of a free market economy. 2. Limited Government Intervention: Right-wing ideology emphasizes limited government intervention in the economy. By implementing a ban on advertising for online gambling sites, the government is overstepping its boundaries and interfering in the private sector. It is not the role of the government to dictate what types of products or services can be advertised, as long as they are legal. 3. Personal Responsibility: Individuals should be responsible for their own choices and actions. By banning advertising for online gambling sites, the government is assuming that individuals are not capable of making informed decisions about their own entertainment and leisure activities. This undermines the principle of personal responsibility and treats individuals as incapable of making their own choices. 4. Economic Impact: The online gambling industry contributes significantly to the economy, creating jobs and generating tax revenue. By prohibiting advertising for online gambling sites, the government is hindering the growth of this industry and potentially causing economic harm. This goes against the principles of free-market capitalism and limits opportunities for economic prosperity. 5. Ineffectiveness: Prohibiting advertising for online gambling sites may not effectively address the concerns associated with gambling addiction or problem gambling. Instead of banning advertising, the government should focus on implementing effective regulations and providing resources for individuals who may be struggling with gambling-related issues. A more comprehensive approach that includes education, support, and responsible gambling measures would be more effective in addressing the potential harms associated with online gambling. In conclusion, while Bill 126 aims to restrict advertising for online gambling sites, it is important to consider the potential negative consequences and the infringement on individual freedom and limited government intervention. A more balanced approach that focuses on personal responsibility, economic impact, and effective regulation would be more aligned with right-wing anti-government principles.
First Reading
  • June 6, 2023, noon
  • In Progress
  • Read