SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 287

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
February 28, 2024 02:00PM
Context: House Hansard - 287 - Feb/28/24
The Deputy Speaker
  • Feb/28/24 7:56:59 p.m.
  • Watch
I believe we have a point of order. The hon. member for North Okanagan—Shuswap.
16 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Mel Arnold
  • Feb/28/24 7:57:03 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I do not see the relevance of this conversation to the debate at hand. I would like the member to get on with the actual debate at hand.
37 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Deputy Speaker
  • Feb/28/24 7:57:14 p.m.
  • Watch
I thank the hon. member for bringing that up. I would remind colleagues to keep their conversations relevant to the bill at hand. The hon. parliamentary secretary to the government House leader.
32 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Kevin Lamoureux
  • Feb/28/24 7:57:26 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I would say it is a rookie mistake, but it is actually not a mistake; it is absolutely relevant when we are talking about the need to extend debating hours. The Conservatives were crying because they were not getting enough hours, and I am giving examples of how they would prevent debate by bringing concurrence motions. I cited the Ukraine trade agreement, which is about as relevant as one can be regarding the motion at hand. We can talk about the extension of the hours, but I have a better one for the member opposite: Voting. Members will recall when close to 50% of the Conservatives, not necessarily that member, were sleeping during the last vote-a-thon, assuming that is what they were doing between midnight and eight o'clock in the morning, we continued to vote? The Conservative Party continued to vote, not necessarily all its members. Some highlights of what they actually voted on are interesting. Let us remember that some members had been up for 24 hours, and we were voting on a whole lot of tax dollars. To give members a few examples of what was being voted on, there was the construction of 71,000 new rental homes through the apartment construction loan program, the construction of 12,000 new affordable homes through the rapid housing initiative and the crackdown on terrorism financing. There was the federal housing advocate. There was a vote on the Ukrainian immigrants settling in Canada, helping them find accommodations and initial financial support. There was the training of Ukrainian soldiers through Operation Unifier, not to mention Canada's NATO mission. There is a long list here, and a good portion of it took place while half the Conservative caucus was not even around to vote because it was nighttime. This motion would make sure that not only the Conservatives would have that health break between midnight and nine o'clock, but also all members would have the same treatment. What is wrong with that? As I pointed out, with those three main aspects, I would think the Conservative Party would support that. All one needs to do is to reflect on many of the tactics the Conservative Party has used over the years. I can cite that the biggest one is probably the concurrence motions. One that really gets me is when one Conservative member stands up, and then another member stands up to say that they move to now be heard, so there are two Conservatives fighting about who can speak. As a result, the bells ring for a half hour. What about when they move a motion to adjourn the House, which then causes the bells to ring? Those are all attempts to prevent debate from occurring. We want debate. We want a healthier democracy. If we support a healthier democracy here in Canada, here on the floor of the House of Commons, I would hope Conservatives would recognize and would support this motion. Not supporting it sends a message to their constituents that they are not prepared to work hard, and they are quite frankly part of a Conservative far right MAGA movement that wants to destabilize our institutions.
535 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Deputy Speaker
  • Feb/28/24 8:01:08 p.m.
  • Watch
It being 8:01 p.m., pursuant to order made earlier today, it is my duty to interrupt the proceedings and put forthwith every question necessary to dispose of Motion No. 35 under Government Business, which is now before the House. The question is on the motion. If a member participating in person wishes that the motion be carried or carried on division, or that a member of a recognized party participating in person wishes to request a recorded division, I would invite them to rise and indicate it to the Chair. The hon. member for Battle River—Crowfoot.
102 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Damien Kurek
  • Feb/28/24 8:02:30 p.m.
  • Watch
I would ask for a recorded vote.
7 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Deputy Speaker
  • Feb/28/24 8:02:33 p.m.
  • Watch
Call in the members.
4 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Deputy Speaker
  • Feb/28/24 8:44:40 p.m.
  • Watch
I declare the motion carried. It being 8:45 p.m., the House stands adjourned until tomorrow at 10 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1). (The House adjourned at 8:45 p.m.)
35 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border