44th Parl. 1st Sess.

February 15, 2024 10:00AM

Context: House Hansard - 283 - Feb/15/24

Mr. Todd Doherty (Cariboo—Prince George, CPC)

Feb/15/24 10:42:57 a.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, I have sat through much of this debate, on the committee as well. The provinces and territories did not ask for a three-year pause; they asked for an indeterminate pause because they are not ready. Industry is not ready. The health care professionals cannot come to any conclusions. As a matter of fact, Dr. Gaind, a professor of psychiatry at U of T, summed it up best at the committee last night. He said, “once again, there is no evidence that shows we can predict irremediability in mental illness, and it is vastly different from other medical conditions and neurodegenerative diseases...but we have to remember what MAID is about. It is about us predicting who will never get better, and we can't do that. And if we can't do that with mental illness, we would be providing death under false pretenses.” He equated it to being much like flipping a coin to choose who could get better and who could not. MAID would simply be killing people who could possibly get better. What would my hon. colleague say to that?

188 words

Hear!
Rabble!
add
star_border
share

Context: House Hansard - 283 - Feb/15/24

Mr. Garnett Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, CPC)

Feb/15/24 4:59:27 p.m.
Watch

Mr. Speaker, I have a question for the government about its so-called “MAID policy”. Its members have said repeatedly, especially as it relates to mental health challenges, that their MAID policy would aim to exclude those who are suicidal, but I want to understand something from the government: Is not any person who requests MAID suicidal, simply by definition, since they are requesting MAID?

67 words

Hear!
Rabble!
add
star_border
share

SoVote

House Hansard - 283