44th Parl. 1st Sess.
April 18, 2023 10:00AM
- Apr/18/23 2:33:48 p.m.
- Watch
I just want to ask members to be judicious in the language being used in the chamber on both sides, whether they are asking the question or answering it.
The hon. government House leader.
34 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/18/23 2:34:12 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, as the hon. member across is well aware, this government has taken a series of measures to help those who are dealing with the global impact of inflation, and the party opposite has voted against every single one of those measures and continues to oppose measures like the important grocery rebate that we put forward.
However, I would say this to members of the party opposite. I get that they do not like the Prime Minister. I get that they have personal animosity and partisan attacks that they want to level against him, but I would ask them again: Do they believe that a prime minister should not be able to travel at Christmas with his family, or do they believe that he should not have security when he does so?
133 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/18/23 2:34:51 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, all we are saying is that he should pay for his own vacations and not stick taxpayers with the bill.
While Canadians were experiencing the chaos that his mismanagement of the airport system caused, the Prime Minister got to skip the queues and jet down on yet another Caribbean vacation. The Prime Minister never has to pay for the terrible policies that his decisions make. Other Canadians have to pay for the higher cost of the fuel they put in their cars; he does not. He also does not have to pay for his own home heating fuel, and now we are finding out that he does not even pay for his own vacation.
Treasury Board guidelines say that he should reimburse at least the commercial cost. Did he?
131 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/18/23 2:35:32 p.m.
- Watch
Yes, Mr. Speaker, I can absolutely confirm that he did cover that cost. I can confirm that to the member across, yes, absolutely.
I would ask the member to step away from the idea of attacking this Prime Minister, and from his partisanship, and I would ask him about a future prime minister. Would a future prime minister be afforded the opportunity to take a vacation with his family? If he believes that is the case, does he believe that a prime minister should be afforded security? If he does believe that, which is the vast preponderance of these costs, then certainly he would see that the actions taken were reasonable.
111 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/18/23 2:36:09 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, if the government House leader is going to answer specific questions, the Prime Minister dodged this question five times. Now, the government House leader just answered that yes, he does pay, but the specific question is this: Did the Prime Minister reimburse or pay for the commercial value of the accommodations? The accommodations for this luxury villa run as high as $9,000 per night. The specific question is this: Did the Prime Minister pay for it?
79 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/18/23 2:36:37 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister taking a vacation with his family over Christmas, with his friends, is a preoccupation—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh!
25 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/18/23 2:36:45 p.m.
- Watch
I want to remind hon. members to not call each other names.
The hon. government House leader.
17 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/18/23 2:37:07 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, it is clear in the questions, and in the way those questions are posed, that the interest of the party opposite is a partisan interest. It is an interest to attack to advance its partisan advantage.
I would suggest to those members that, at this moment, when we are dealing with a series of issues on this planet, such as global inflation and the war in Europe, that their particular fixation with the Prime Minister being able to take a vacation with his family and friends at Christmas is very revealing.
93 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/18/23 2:37:41 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister spent two weeks on vacation at Peter Green's estate down south. This trip cost taxpayers $160,000. He confirmed that the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner gave him the green light for the trip, but I am not convinced that the commissioner knew that the vacation would take place at the home of a Trudeau Foundation donor.
Can the Prime Minister tell us today whether the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner was aware, yes or no, that the invitation came from a Trudeau Foundation donor?
94 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/18/23 2:38:10 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the question is clear. Can the Prime Minister go on vacation with his family? If the Prime Minister goes on vacation at Christmas with his family, can he have security for his family? If so, obviously, there is a cost for that. That cost is quite reasonable.
50 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/18/23 2:38:38 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the most ironic thing about this saga is that, according to media reports, the Prime Minister's own staff was concerned about the optics of this trip. We know that 62% of Canadians are cancelling or considering cancelling their vacations because they cannot afford them, due to inflation.
Let us come back to the concerns of the Prime Minister's staff. Were they concerned because Canadians were going through tough times or because the Prime Minister was going to the residence of a Trudeau Foundation donor?
88 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/18/23 2:39:10 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, It is obvious that the concern of the party opposite is purely partisan.
There are many really serious problems in Canada, such as affordability and the cost of living. These problems are addressed in the budget, which is being studied in Parliament. The Conservative Party could vote for measures to help Canadians, but no, as usual the Conservative Party is only interested in playing politics.
67 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/18/23 2:39:44 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the CBC—the Liberal propaganda arm, according to the Conservative Party—reports that the Prime Minister spent his Christmas holiday with friends who made significant donations to the Trudeau Foundation. These are childhood friends, one of whom is Pierre Elliott Trudeau's godson. These people are major donors to a foundation embroiled in allegations of suspicious donations linked to the Chinese government. Those are the people the Prime Minister chose to vacation with.
On top of his lack of judgment and lack of ethics, how can the Prime Minister continue to claim that he has no ties to the Trudeau Foundation?
105 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/18/23 2:40:20 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister can say that because it is true.
The Prime Minister has not had any ties to the foundation for 10 years.
26 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/18/23 2:40:34 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, that was quick.
There is reality and there is the perception of reality. The Trudeau Foundation received money from Chinese donors, that is reality. The Prime Minister went on vacation to visit one of the Trudeau Foundation's major donors, that is reality. Morris Rosenberg, who was commissioned by the Prime Minister to assess foreign interference in elections, was CEO of the Trudeau Foundation, that is reality. David Johnston, the special rapporteur on Chinese interference appointed by the Prime Minister, is a member of the Trudeau Foundation, that is reality.
We cannot help but think that the Chinese government is using the Trudeau Foundation to influence the Prime Minister, and it is working.
116 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/18/23 2:41:15 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, there is no question that every member of the House, on this side and certainly in opposition, is loyal to our country, Canada. There is absolutely no question that interference from China or other countries is designed to destroy our democracy. That is a serious concern for us and that is why we are using every avenue we can to protect our country.
66 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/18/23 2:41:53 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the problem is that people get lost in all these distractions.
The Trudeau Foundation is problematic. What is even more problematic is foreign interference in our elections.
A foreign power, China, is interfering in our democratic process. This undermines public confidence. That is the crux of the issue. We absolutely need an independent public commission of inquiry to ensure the integrity of our elections and to restore public trust.
What is the Prime Minister waiting for?
78 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/18/23 2:42:32 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, it is absolutely essential, not only for us, the government, but for each and every member of Parliament, that our democratic system ensure we have independent elections.
That is why we made sure to appoint someone who is very reasonable and well known across the country, Mr. Johnston, the former governor general appointed by Mr. Harper, who can ensure that our system is protected.
66 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/18/23 2:43:09 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, everyone agrees that a prime minister should be able to take a holiday, and everyone agrees that the cost of security was reasonable. Everyone also knows, now that we have heard a direct answer on the cost of the flight, what the Prime Minister did.
What we do not know is if the Prime Minister did the reasonable thing and paid for his own accommodations, which every other Canadian would have had to do. Did the Prime Minister pay the cost of a $9,000 per night villa when he went on that trip?
96 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/18/23 2:43:50 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, one could ask the question, when a party opposite now is deep into question period asking only questions about the Prime Minister's trip over Christmas with his family, to see that their interest is partisan in nature. Their interest is to advance their own interests rather than the interests of the people whom we are all elected to represent.
There is a budget in front of us right now, on which they are asking no questions, which has absolutely critical measures to help those who are in need in the country right now. Therefore, I understand the members' particular fixation. I am glad they agree with me that the Prime Minister should take a vacation. I am glad that they agree that the costs of security were reasonable.
131 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- menumenu
- notificationsnotifications
- home
- mailmail
- searchsearch
