SoVote

Context: House Hansard - 127 - Nov/15/22

Nov/15/22 4:55:07 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, a hybrid Parliament and remote voting are two initiatives that the NDP has been pushing for and that are vastly improving the lives of fathers and mothers. I was a single dad, so it is extremely important to me that we provide that access. I simply cannot understand why the Bloc Québécois members opposed those two measures, which are so important to work-life balance.

71 words

Ms. Elizabeth May (Saanich—Gulf Islands, GP)

Nov/15/22 4:55:38 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, I have tried to remember the context in which one hon. member from the Conservative Party talked about the Constitution. In fairness, it was not an effort to say that the Constitution said that MPs do not want to work late. The point was that our committee work is also important work in Parliament. On this issue I feel torn. I will certainly vote for the main motion that we should be prepared to work until midnight to get work done, but I am concerned. Committees do important work. In all seriousness, because I respect the opinion of the hon. member for New Westminster—Burnaby a great deal, the committees do important work. Sometimes we have witnesses come who are refugees or who have been tortured, and this is a specific example, but they have been sent away because we do not have the resources to stretch. Could we not, in this place, get the resources we need to both work late and keep committees going?

169 words

Mr. Peter Julian

Nov/15/22 4:56:37 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, I agree with the member for Saanich—Gulf Islands that committees do important work. We have to ensure that we have in place, particularly with the interpreting staff, the number of interpreters that allows interpretation to take place both in the House and in committees safely and in a way that ensures that we have the resources available. We are certainly pushing the government, as members from all sides are, to ensure that we have those resources in place. That being said, as the member knows, at committee level we have to also make sure that every witness is wearing only equipment authorized by the House of Commons. This was a problem in the Senate a couple of weeks ago when, sadly, an interpreter was sent to the hospital. Therefore, we have to make sure of the safety and make sure the resources are available. I completely agree that we can do both.

156 words

Mr. Marty Morantz (Charleswood—St. James—Assiniboia—Headingley, CPC)

Nov/15/22 4:57:46 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, I would like to read this into the record. This is section 48 of the Constitution Act, 1867. It says: The Presence of at least Twenty Members of the House of Commons shall be necessary to constitute a Meeting of the House for the Exercise of its Powers, and for that Purpose the Speaker shall be reckoned as a Member. Does the hon. member understand that he is advocating for the passage of a motion which is in direct conflict with the Constitution of Canada?

87 words

Mr. Peter Julian

Nov/15/22 4:58:17 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, that is crazy disinformation. We saw Doug Ford after court cases had clearly indicated that he could not use the notwithstanding clause to impede labour rights in this country, and not a single Conservative stood up against that. Not a single Conservative stood up and said, “This is not something that we will tolerate or that we will abide by.” Therefore, we have a situation where Conservatives throw the Constitution out the door whenever they want to, and they do not respect the right of Canadians to get representation from their MPs working in the evenings.

100 words

Mr. Mark Gerretsen (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons (Senate), Lib.)

Nov/15/22 4:58:59 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, I will be sharing my time with the member for Trois-Rivières. I will answer the question the Conservatives asked about having quorum in the House and it being in the Constitution. The unfortunate reality for the Conservative member who asked the question is that he should know that he has participated in unanimous consent motions in the House to waive that provision in the past. He has already set the precedent himself, so has the Conservative Party and, as a matter of fact, every single person in the House has set the precedent to waive the requirements for quorum. We cannot be selective as to when we want to interpret the Constitution to our benefit, which is what the Conservatives are trying to do now. The reality is that there is been a long-standing precedent to waive the requirement for quorum under certain conditions, and that is exactly what we are seeing in this motion. There is the same consistency that comes with that. However, I think what we really have to do with this motion is get to the heart of what is going on. At the heart is the Conservatives' partisan interest and allowing that to supersede the needs of Canadians. That is exactly what is going on here, and I will demonstrate in my speech today how they have routinely done that, not over the last seven years of my being in the House and watching it, although they have done it over the seven years, but five examples just in this fall session alone when they have done that. They have done it on multiple occasions using multiple different tools. Any individual who has participated in or is well versed in how the Westminster parliamentary system works knows that the one tool the opposition has is to delay. That is its sole tool, and it is important for the opposition to exercise the use of that tool when it can to garner support, or whatever it might be, when they find those issues to be so important. When the opposition feels the issue is the hill it will die on, it will fight, delay and filibuster if it has to, because it feels something is not right. That is the main tool opposition parties have in a parliamentary system like this. The problem is that Conservatives are using it all the time. They are using that tool for everything. They are saying absolutely every piece of legislation that comes before the House is a hill they will die on, and the problem is that this diminishes the value of the tool they have. It also affects directly, and this is what I do not understand, their credibility on the issue. When they stand up to delay things they are fully in support of, do they not understand that the public sees that? They are doing the same thing, and their partisan interest in seeing the government fail is more important to them than actually providing supports for Canadians. Let us review some of the legislation from this fall alone. With Bill C-29, the truth and reconciliation bill, the Conservative Party blocked a motion to sit late to try to pass the bill at second reading before the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation, which is what the government, and I think all Canadians, would have loved to have seen. It was not until pressure was mounted on them by the public that they backed down from that position. Another one was Bill C-30, the GST tax credit. This is a bill that needed to be passed in a timely manner to get real supports to Canadians. They were real supports for Canadians that needed to be done in a timely fashion to line up with when the GST payments were made. The Conservatives, again, blocked a motion to sit late on the second reading of that important piece of legislation. They only backed down again and changed their minds on how they would vote on that particular piece of legislation based on public criticism and the public holding them accountable for playing the games they are playing. That is the reality of what we are seeing. Bill C-31 is the bill that afforded very important measures regarding dental care and housing supports. The Conservative Party, again, blocked the adoption of the legislation to help the most vulnerable, forcing the government, with the help of the NDP, to have a programming motion to get it passed, and this is what we see time after time. The next is Bill C-9, which would amend the Judges Act, and I will remind members this is all happened during this fall session alone. We had technical issues with interpretation with that bill. The Conservatives are always standing up and using the interpreters as one of their arguments for making sure we have the best quality of debate in the House. When there was a problem with interpretation, which delayed the debate of the bill, the Conservatives refused to support a motion to add time to the debate that day. The Conservatives say that they want more time to debate. We literally said that we lost 30 minutes of time because of a problem and we had to temporarily suspend, so how about we add that 30 minutes onto the end of the day. The Conservatives said no. This is the group that is now sitting before us saying that they are in favour of doing absolutely everything to increase democracy and that they want more speakers on every issue. The one glaring example of this happening in this fall session was with Bill S-5. The bill is on environmental protections, and it is a bill everybody in the House supported. It was unanimously adopted. Conservatives put up 27 speakers on it. I want to provide a comparison for those who might be watching. Compared to that number, Liberals put up six speakers, the NDP put up four speakers, the Bloc put up five speakers and the Green Party put up one speaker. What is even more telling is that, if someone goes back to look at Hansard or watch the videos—

1043 words

All Topics

The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes)

Nov/15/22 5:05:23 p.m.
Watch

We have a point of order. The hon. member for Fort McMurray—Cold Lake.

15 words

Mrs. Laila Goodridge

Nov/15/22 5:05:26 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, I think it is rather ironic that we are here debating a motion that is going to limit much of our capacity here. I sit here in this chamber, and I believe we do not have quorum.

39 words

All Topics

The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes)

Nov/15/22 5:05:45 p.m.
Watch

If the hon. member is raising a point on quorum, she needs to raise that point and not be part of the debate. I will double check to see if we have quorum. And the count having been taken: The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes): We currently have quorum in the House. The hon. parliamentary secretary.

57 words

Mr. Mark Gerretsen

Nov/15/22 5:06:12 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, it is absolutely remarkable that the Conservatives proved my point during my speech. What do the Conservatives do? They play these games where suddenly they all leave the room and then ask for a quorum call. I am not referencing any particular member, but there were about 20 or 30 Conservatives sitting here when I began my speech, and right now that number has significantly reduced. They are going to say they do not want to hear me speak, and that is fair enough, but we all know what they are up to. They are playing games to try to prevent the business of the House from occurring, and we see this routinely. As I get back to Bill S-5, a bill that absolutely everybody in the House ended up voting in favour of, what did the Conservatives do? They did not even speak to the bill when it was on the floor. I encourage members to go back to look at Hansard and watch the videos. The Conservatives spoke about everything except Bill S-5. Why did they do that? It was because there was nothing to be critical of.

194 words

Mr. Larry Brock

Nov/15/22 5:07:17 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order. We do not have quorum.

14 words

All Topics

The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes)

Nov/15/22 5:07:22 p.m.
Watch

The member is calling for quorum. I will check with the clerks. And the count having been taken: The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes): We do have quorum in the House at the moment. The hon. parliamentary secretary to the government House leader.

44 words

Mr. Mark Gerretsen

Nov/15/22 5:07:50 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, you can see what is happening. The member for Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes, my neighbour, is orchestrating all of this right now. He is standing right behind the door over there orchestrating it—

41 words

All Topics

The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes)

Nov/15/22 5:08:02 p.m.
Watch

The hon. member cannot indicate who is in the House and who is not in the House. An hon. member: Oh, oh! The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes): When I am speaking, the hon. member should not be interrupting me. We have another point of order. The hon. member for Fort McMurray—Cold Lake.

56 words

Mrs. Laila Goodridge

Nov/15/22 5:08:22 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, I think it is shameful that not only did the member think that it was appropriate to mention who may or may not have been in the House, but also that he is imputing false motives on members.

40 words

All Topics

The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes)

Nov/15/22 5:08:37 p.m.
Watch

That is debate. The hon. member for Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes is rising on another point of order.

23 words

Mr. Michael Barrett

Nov/15/22 5:08:41 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, with respect to the point of order raised by the member for Kingston and the Islands, my role at that time was simply—

26 words

All Topics

The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes)

Nov/15/22 5:09:09 p.m.
Watch

I did indicate that the member is not to indicate who is in the House and who is not in the House. Therefore, I am going to allow the debate to continue because the hon. member is raising a point of debate and not a point of order. The hon. parliamentary secretary.

52 words

Mr. Mark Gerretsen

Nov/15/22 5:09:37 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, I do not even really need to say much more, other than that the people watching at home have witnessed what just happened in this House. They are seeing first-hand on their TV screens, or wherever they happen to be watching this, the games that Conservatives will play and, guess what, the Bloc Québécois is right there with them playing these games, too. If anybody in this House really needs a reason as to why we need the motion that we are going to vote on later this evening, they need look no further than the games that the Conservatives and the Bloc are playing while I am speaking. That is the reality of the situation. They can laugh and chuckle and give me the thumbs-up like they are doing, but it is very clear what is going on. I will go back to where I started, and that is this obtuse idea that the Conservatives are somehow trying to suggest that there is less democracy as a result of sitting late. I am sorry, but if Conservatives thought when they were elected that this was a nine-to-five job, they were mistaken. I would encourage—

206 words

The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes)

Nov/15/22 5:10:53 p.m.
Watch

There seem to be some discussions going back and forth. I do not have my speakers on, but the hon. member has a boisterous voice and I can still hear the heckling and discussions going on. I would remind members that if they want to have conversations, they should take them outside. If they want to heckle, I would ask them to wait until it is time for questions and comments. They will have a better opportunity to be heard at that time. The hon. parliamentary secretary has one minute to finish his speech before we get to the interesting part of questions and comments.

105 words