44th Parl. 1st Sess.
June 17, 2022 10:00AM
- Jun/17/22 11:24:59 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, yesterday in Toronto, the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance was supposed to make an announcement that would give Canadians some relief from inflation. Unfortunately, once again, the Minister of Finance showed that she is completely out of touch with the reality all Canadians are facing. There was no announcement at all, just more rehashing of the same Liberal talking points.
Here is a simple question for the government: Why is the Liberal government refusing to give Canadian families a break by lowering taxes?
87 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/17/22 11:25:31 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, the answer is very simple. We lowered taxes for the middle class, and the Conservatives voted against it. It is unacceptable that today the Conservatives are asking us to do something they refused to do a few years ago.
Yesterday, the Deputy Prime Minister announced our plan to support Canadians during this time of inflation and rising costs of living. It is a serious plan. The Conservatives have no suggestions.
72 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/17/22 11:25:33 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, every Canadian knows that on April 1, this government increased the Liberal carbon tax. Writing in Le Journal de Québec and Le Journal de Montréal today, Loïc Tassé was blunt but truthful.
He wrote that all these measures by the Liberal government will not fight inflation. On the contrary, they will accelerate it. He asks: “What magical world is she living in?”
The problem is that while the minister is living in her magical world, Canadians are living in the Liberal government's Canada, where taxes are spiralling. Why is the government refusing to lower taxes for all Canadians?
112 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/17/22 11:26:14 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, in his question, my colleague talked about carbon pricing. I would like to begin by reminding him that federal carbon pricing does not apply in Quebec because Quebec has its own cap-and-trade system.
Second, in provinces where carbon pricing is in effect, people get more back from the system than they put into it. In Ontario, families will get $745 this year. In Manitoba, they will get $830. In Saskatchewan, they will get $1,100, and in Alberta, they will get $1,080. Canadians are better off with the pollution pricing system.
96 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/17/22 11:26:54 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, it is always a treat when the founder of Équiterre, who is currently being sued by Équiterre, is in teacher mode.
The fact is, countries such as Germany, England, Australia, South Korea and the United States have taken steps to lower taxes, especially those that affect the price of gas, which affects everyone, particularly when it is time to buy groceries.
Groceries need to be transported. That takes gas, which means taxes are rolled into prices. Why is the government refusing to lower taxes?
88 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/17/22 11:27:35 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, honestly, it is such a shame that one of our colleagues from Quebec is arguing favour of cutting taxes for oil companies when we know we are facing a climate crisis here in Canada and around the world.
We will end up paying a lot more if we do not tackle the climate crisis right now. That is what we this side of the House are doing.
69 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/17/22 11:28:04 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, Quebec's minister of the French language, Simon Jolin‑Barrette, has been invited to address the Académie française. He will head to Paris to explain to “the immortals”, who have been defending the French language for 400 years, how Quebec plans to protect its national language.
The Minister of Official Languages has also introduced a bill that is supposed to protect the future of French. Has she also been invited to address the Académie française?
88 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/17/22 11:28:34 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, I want to thank my colleague for her question.
We recognize that French is in decline in North America and that French is in decline in Canada. That is why we went ahead with a much more robust version of the bill, to ensure that we can address this situation.
I want to once again extend an invitation to the opposition members, especially the Bloc Québécois, to work with us because we do share a common objective, which is to ensure that we are doing everything we can to protect the beautiful French language.
100 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
Madam Speaker, I will take that as a no. It is probably because Bill C‑13 does not really protect French in Quebec. It protects institutional bilingualism, which results in the anglicization of workplaces and reduces the perception of the importance of being fluent in French in Quebec. Bill C‑13 does not recognize that French is the only official language that requires protection in light of the predominance of English in North America.
Is it possible that the Académie française did not invite the Minister of Official Languages because Bill C‑13 lacks vision?
104 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
Madam Speaker, very briefly, it is clear that the member opposite has not read Bill C‑13, because the opposite is true.
I really believe that the Bloc Québécois is misleading Canadians. We have moved forward with a new bill to ensure that all federally regulated private businesses are subject to this new law, that workers can work in French and that clients can be served in French, and also that they live in French in their community.
Once again, I would like to make sure that the members of the opposition will work with the government to pass this bill as quickly as possible.
111 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/17/22 11:30:15 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, hard-working Canadians are getting crushed by the rising cost of living. People across the country can barely afford the gas to drive to work or to get groceries.
Yesterday, the government had a chance to finally give them a helping hand. Instead, the Deputy Prime Minister was on Bay Street, reassuring the richest 1% that the Liberals would not tax record oil and gas profits or give Canadians the help they need right now.
What will it take for the government to stop making re-announcements and finally stand up for working class Canadians getting gouged at the pumps?
102 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/17/22 11:30:52 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, yesterday, the Minister of Finance did give a speech on Bay Street in order to explain to Canadians how we have their backs in this time of unprecedented volatility on a global scale.
In fact, she detailed a five-point plan that is going to help Canadians deal with the inflationary crisis that we are seeing right around the world. We have an affordability plan that is putting money directly back into the pockets of Canadians. What the NDP is proposing is tax hikes on grocery stores, which could only lead to increased prices for groceries—
99 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/17/22 11:31:29 a.m.
- Watch
The hon. member for Elmwood—Transcona.
7 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/17/22 11:31:33 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, in her speech at the Empire Club this week, the Deputy Prime Minister treated inflation like it was a public relations problem for the government rather than the very real financial issue that it is for so many Canadians.
As she was speaking, new mothers on employment insurance and others depending on EI were having their EI payments garnished to pay debt back to the government while they were trying to keep their homes. It is the wrong approach. We did not hear anything new in the speech yesterday.
I am hoping we are soon going to hear that the government will bring into force a low-income CERB repayment amnesty and a freeze on payments for middle-class Canadians who are struggling to keep their homes in this time of inflation. When are we going to hear that?
141 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/17/22 11:32:21 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, I would like to thank the finance critic for the NDP for his question and for his work on the finance committee.
I would point out that yesterday's plan announced by our Minister of Finance included many supports that Canadians would feel for the first time this year. For a couple in Ontario with an income of $45,000 and a child in day care, our plan could mean an additional $7,350 this year, above existing benefits. This is real money going back into the pockets of real Canadians.
93 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/17/22 11:32:58 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, Canadians are struggling and looking for relief, but instead, they are getting skyrocketing costs, unaffordable groceries and toonie-a-litre gas. It is because of the Liberals' reckless spending and double dipping with taxes on top of taxes that Canadians are barely making it to the end of the month. Just like George Costanza, these Liberals will keep dipping as they see fit. It is disgusting.
When will the Liberals stop double dipping in Canadians' pockets and give us some relief?
83 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/17/22 11:33:31 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, the Conservatives are making jokes about a very serious situation. Maybe the hon. member saw what happened this week with cryptocurrency. That is the type of economic policy that is coming from the Conservative Party these days. Do the Conservatives not agree that a 50% reduction in child care this year is real savings for Canadian families? Do they not believe that $2,400 in the pockets of a family of three through the Canada workers benefit is real money in the pockets of Canadian workers? They should know that. They voted against all of these measures.
99 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/17/22 11:34:06 a.m.
- Watch
There is a lot of chatting back and forth here. I would ask, if members are not being recognized for questions or answers, that they hold on to their thoughts.
The hon. member for Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes.
43 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/17/22 11:34:21 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, the parliamentary secretary talks about jokes. What is a joke is that yesterday, the minister stood in the House when I talked about rising costs and talked about history with things that happened 10 years ago, when it was her government and the minister's department that approved $93,000 in champagne and caviar for government officials, while Canadians cannot afford to heat their homes or feed their families. It is a failed approach that they have doubled down on time and again. If anyone is laughing, we cannot hear them because the joke is on that side of the House. It might come as a surprise to them, but just like budgets, gas prices and grocery bills will not balance themselves.
Will the Liberals cut taxes for Canadians?
131 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/17/22 11:35:04 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, we did cut taxes for Canadians and the Conservatives voted against it. Thank goodness there was other support in the House to ensure that Canadians would see a reduction in their taxes. When it comes to supporting Canadians, we will continue to put in place the measures that put money directly back into the pockets of Canadians. I am thinking of a one-time payment for all Canadians having trouble finding low-income housing that is coming into effect this year. We also have a reduction in child care costs of up to 50% this year. That is real money going back into the pockets of real Canadians.
110 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- menumenu
- notificationsnotifications
- home
- mailmail
- searchsearch
