44th Parl. 1st Sess.
June 2, 2022 10:00AM
- Jun/2/22 2:52:33 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, we know that working-age persons with disabilities in Canada are twice as likely to live in poverty as those without disabilities. This is unacceptable. That is why this government is taking historic measures to build a disability inclusive Canada.
This morning, the Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Disability Inclusion tabled legislation for the Canada disability benefit. Can the minister please share with us how this will help lift Canadians with disabilities out of poverty?
78 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/2/22 2:53:08 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I thank my friend from Newmarket—Aurora for his tireless work and advocacy for persons with disabilities.
On this sixth annual National AccessAbility Week, I was proud to reintroduce legislation for the Canada disability benefit, an income supplement for working-age persons with disabilities. The CDB has the potential to significantly reduce poverty, to improve financial security and to help hundreds of thousands of people.
This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to correct the long-standing social and economic exclusion that has hurt far too many Canadians.
92 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/2/22 2:53:43 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I want to make sure I have this right. First, the Liberals impose a tariff on fertilizer that only punishes Canadian farmers. Second, they ignore any plea for an exemption on the fertilizer purchased before March 2. Third, they are offering no compensation, meaning that higher taxes and input costs are crushing Canadian farm families.
How many other G7 countries are enforcing a fertilizer tariff and putting their farmers at a competitive disadvantage?
75 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/2/22 2:54:14 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Conservatives keep proposing policies that they have not really fully thought through. Rising gas prices are a global phenomenon, as we all know, due in part to the war that Putin started in Ukraine. If we implement a tax holiday, as the Conservatives have been proposing for a number of weeks now, energy companies could actually pocket—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh!
66 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/2/22 2:54:37 p.m.
- Watch
I am sorry, but I have to interrupt the hon. parliamentary secretary.
I am having a hard time hearing her answer and I am sure the hon. member for Foothills wants to hear her answer as well. I am going to ask everyone to calm down and take a deep breath. The chatter is starting to build again.
The hon. parliamentary secretary, from the top, please.
66 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/2/22 2:55:00 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, it seems that my answer is garnering a lot of interest on the other side of the House. The gist of my response is that the Conservatives have been proposing a number of economic measures that they have not thought through, whether they are with respect to the gas tax or fertilizer. What they are proposing is simply a tax holiday, which in no way guarantees that the consumer or our farmers will benefit at the end of the day.
82 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/2/22 2:55:28 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, please allow me to actually answer the question for the parliamentary secretary. The answer is zero.
Canada is the only country punishing its farmers with a tariff on fertilizer. Our G7 allies are doing everything they possibly can to ensure that their farmers can increase their yields in a time of global food insecurity. Here, the Liberals are beating our farmers down with increased taxes, red tape and, without any consultation with stakeholders, a mandate to reduce fertilizer use by 30%.
Knowing this, is the fertilizer tariff just another way for the Liberals to impose their activist agenda and force our farmers to use less fertilizer?
108 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/2/22 2:56:08 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, as members know, our goal is to reduce emissions caused by fertilizers. This is not the same as using less fertilizer.
We fully understand that fertilizers are important for our agricultural producers and for our food security.
We are working closely with the industry, with Fertilizer Canada and with many sectors that support us, that want to do more and that appreciate our subsidies, including those for clean technologies and best practices.
74 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/2/22 2:56:47 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the government is doing nothing for food security. Day after day, the Liberals claim that Saskatchewan farm families are actually making money from their carbon tax. That is hogwash. In fact, a producer told me his rebates would not even cover two weeks' worth of fuel since the Liberals last unfair carbon tax increase. My friend's cost to run his equipment is now $90,000 a week.
As other G7 countries around the world provide tax relief, and with the world's third-largest producer of wheat in a war zone right now, what is the government doing to not punish our farmers and allow them to produce the food the world needs?
116 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/2/22 2:57:31 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I assure my colleagues that we are here to support our farmers and increase production.
At the moment, there is an illegal war happening in Ukraine. We know that Ukraine is a major producer. Canadian farmers want to do more. Our government is there to support them in various ways.
We had an historic budget for agriculture last year. This shows that we are there for the agricultural sector and we are supporting them in various ways.
79 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/2/22 2:58:04 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, no farms, no food. Fertilizer prices are up 50% this year, plus 20% more since the Liberals put the tariff on. That is a 70% increase since last year. They say not to bite the hand that feeds us, but the Liberal government has bitten the hand right off. Its poor decisions are pricing farmers out of business.
Without farmers, Canadians do not have food. Without farmers, where will our food come from?
75 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/2/22 2:58:36 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, once again, our government has provided unprecedented support to agricultural producers. A total of $4 billion—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh!
25 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/2/22 2:58:48 p.m.
- Watch
Is everyone ready to continue?
The hon. Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food.
13 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/2/22 2:59:10 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I repeat, our government has done more than any other to help our agricultural producers. We invested $4 billion to support them last year. That is unprecedented.
Recently, $1.5 billion was invested in all our agri-environmental initiatives. I can assure the House that our agricultural producers know they are part of the solution in the fight against climate change because they are the first to feel the impact.
73 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/2/22 2:59:43 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the federal government literally just stole $342 million from Quebec. It promised to give Quebec leftover money from the public transit infrastructure fund and the clean water and wastewater fund. It is right there in black and white in the Canada-Quebec infrastructure agreement the feds signed in 2018.
On Monday, however, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs, Infrastructure and Communities plainly stated he has no intention of honouring the agreement.
Will he backtrack immediately and announce his intention to give Quebec the $342 million he owes us?
91 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/2/22 3:00:18 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, on the contrary, our government and our minister are committed to getting funds out for transit and infrastructure right across this country, including in Quebec. However, the minister has been clear that Quebec needs to put forward the project, which we can then support.
We are committed to our agreements and ensuring that Quebec has the amounts that have been promised, but they need to step up and identify those projects. We will ensure that transit and infrastructure continue to be built right across this country.
88 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/2/22 3:00:54 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, an agreement is something to be honoured. Not only is Ottawa taking away $342 million from Quebec, but it is threatening to take away another $4 billion by unilaterally changing the deadline for infrastructure projects.
The signed agreement gave Quebec until 2025 to submit projects. Ottawa is shortening that to 2023. This means that if Quebec does not submit all of its projects in the next 10 months, when it should have three years to do so, Ottawa could deprive us of $4 billion. This shows a total lack of respect for Quebeckers. It is our money.
Will the government keep its promises and give this money to Quebec?
115 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/2/22 3:01:35 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, on the contrary, we have not cut a single cent for transit or infrastructure in Quebec. These projects need to be identified. The Quebec government should tell us what its priorities are. Then we will happily move forward on these agreements.
This is about Canadian taxpayers' investments in transit and infrastructure right across this country. We want to ensure that those projects are identified and this money can roll out across Quebec to ensure that it has the transit and infrastructure it needs.
85 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/2/22 3:02:13 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, we have seen democratic decline in Canada under the Liberals, and this is no more true than with the Winnipeg lab documents. NDP members have completely betrayed themselves and the promises they made in the last election. It turns out that this coalition is serving up the worst of both parties: The Liberals are adopting NDP economics and the NDP is adopting the Liberals' culture of secrecy.
Why is the NDP-Liberal government blocking Parliament’s access to these documents?
83 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/2/22 3:02:50 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, we have a different definition of “blocking”. The truth is that the opposition Conservatives asked to look at these documents and were given the opportunity at NSICOP, but they did not want to take the opportunity, which is fine. We provided another mechanism that was based on the same mechanism they used for Afghan detainees. It was a system Mr. Harper and many of those in his caucus then, who are here today, thought was a good system. We agreed; we offered it.
I would ask the member opposite why he is refusing to look at these documents. It is a very bizarre thing to stand up and demand to look at something we are trying to show him.
123 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- menumenu
- notificationsnotifications
- home
- mailmail
- searchsearch
